國外軍事博主將Z-10、LCH直升機搬出來比較，引來各國網友熱議。有些網友認為Z-10要優於LCH，還有些網友則側重於誇讚LCH，認為其高原飛行效能要優於Z-10。
以下為國外網友評論：
原評論：The real and only difference between LCH & Z10 people need to consider is that more than 150 Z10 are built and are in service whereas only 8 LCH are built till today.
譯：LCH與Z-10的真正區別是，Z-10已經有超過150架在役，而LCH僅僅只生產了8架。
原評論：The LCH weighs less and is more maneurable. Also the video has switched the service ceilings (LCH is 21300 feet and Z-10 is 21000 feet according to Wikipedia). Also rate of climb of LCH is better at 2400 feet/min vs Z-10 at 2000 feet/min, says Wikipedia). Also LCH has Israeli Elbit CoMPASS optoelectronic suite, Missile approach warning system and Swedish Saab radar and laser warning system.
譯：LCH的重量更輕，更易於操作，而且LCH最大飛行高度21300英尺（約等於6500米），Z-10則是21000英尺（約等於6400米）。此外，LCH在2400英尺/分鐘的爬升速度要比Z-10在2000英尺/分鐘的爬升速度更好，不僅如此，LCH還擁有以色列的光電系統、導彈以及預警系統。
原評論：Can't compare z10 with lch, LCH has lot of high altitude experience and as well an entire ecosystem is build around central theme of surprise and neutralize in line with central command. .. Anyone who has seen LCH.. Would say it is highly capable.. Can't compare.. Others are not in main streame..
譯：不能把Z-10和LCH相比，LCH有很多高原試飛經歷，而且整機就是為了適應高海拔飛行而設計的。見過LCH的人，都會覺得它更好。
原評論：differences between the two is that Z10 is totally made by china while LCH is made by whole bunch of different countries and put together in India, not made by India.
譯：兩者之間的區別是，Z-10完全由兔子製造，而LCH大部分零部件由其他國家制造，而後在印度組裝，因此那並不是完全印度製造的。
原評論：Z-10 has been operating for a while, while LCH is still under development. Can we make a comparison later when the LCH is induced? Based on our experience with LCA, 15 years from now on would be sufficient.
譯：Z-10已經服役一段時間啦，而LCH仍在發展中。我們可以等到LCH入役後再做比較嗎?根據我們研發LCA的經驗，我覺得LCH花上15年足夠了。
原評論：Lch is a great combat copter and it's better than Apache in quite a handful aspects..only thing is Apache is battle tested but LCH did not have a chance to prove itself in one..don't know why India is buying Apache when it has a better helicopter in it's arsenal and much cheaper too.
譯：LCH是一架很棒的武直，在很多方面都比阿帕奇好，唯一的問題是阿帕奇經過了實戰檢驗，相反，LCH則沒有。印度應該不需要阿帕奇，他們有更好的直升機並且便宜得多。
原評論：Seriously I would buy the Chinese Z10. Chinese technology has even surpassed that of the US. India is still many years behind China.
譯：要我說的話，我會選擇兔子的Z-10，兔子在很多技術領域已經漸漸超過鷹醬，印度仍然落後兔子很多年。
原評論：Z10 and lch are completely different .. main difference is Z10 is made in china and lch with western technologies assembled in india.
譯：Z-10與LCH完全不同。主要區別在於Z-10完全由兔子製造，而LCH是利用西方技術在印度組裝。
原評論：Soooo nearly the same price but one (Z10) can carry more payload further, has far more production experience with 150 in service LCH is only 8 units.
譯：價格差不多，但一架Z-10可以攜帶更多的有效載荷，有更多的使用經驗，已有超過150架入役，而LCH至今只有8架。
原評論：Here HAL LCH is light combat helicopter where on the other hand CAIC Z10 is a medium attack helicopter. So I think it's unfair to compare both. Moreover here in this video both the helicopter's service ceiling has been mentioned wrongly. Because HAL LCH has the highest service ceiling of all attack helicopters in the world with 21,300 feet while Chinese CAIC Z10 has the service ceiling of 21,000 feet only.. Check the details before uploading anything false.
譯：LCH是輕型直升機，而Z-10是中型直升機，我認為將兩者進行比較是不公平的。LCH擁有飛行海拔最高的紀錄21300英尺（約6500米），而Z-10只有21,000英尺（約6400米）的最大升限。
原評論：Why bother comparing them? By the time the Indian has built 150, the Chinese NEXT generation of attack helicopters!
譯：為什麼要比較？等到印度將LCH生產到150架後，兔子的下一代武直恐怕已經出來了！
【注：編譯以上評論只為分享國外網友對此事的觀點與看法，並不代表本人同意某些觀點或理念】
